Search This Blog

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Incpetion *****

There is a long-standing relationship between dreams and change for mankind. Dreaming is portentous in Judeo-Christian culture, Native American culture, ancient Greek and Egyptian cultures, the Aboriginals…the list goes on. Our relationship with dreaming and the search for meaning within our dreams is older than civilization itself.

What if technology could enable us to manipulate dreams? Would even the future then be within our control? This is the question that “Inception” dares to ask. But like all good questions, this question leads to an explosion of other questions not the least of which is - As we can control reality through technology does technology itself have us more and more under its control?

We learned from McCluhan that with every new medium of communication there is change in the possibility of the messages sent; what would happen to dreaming itself if we could control it? Is there a point in which a dream could have no more personal significance then a text message?

Because "Inception" is a movie about dreaming it poses questions tacitly. By being a medium for the depiction of both reality and dreams, the movie itself begs comparison to a shared dream. Because its depiction places dreams and reality on different levels it can depict levels of dreaming, the way we can wake from a dream only to find ourselves still dreaming. But if we can share the dream with other people, how is it not a reality and further perhaps a more preferable one (see Accidental Critic Classic The Purple Rose of Cairo)?

But in reality we are asleep when we dream. And in reality technology makes dreams come true. “Inception” asks as we live the dreams of technology might we be asleep on our feet?

At one point in the movie, our hero (played by Leonardo DiCaprio) draws a diagram to show that what makes dreaming so alluring to a creator is that you can make a reality as fast as its enjoyment. There is no gap between idea, design and production.

For the creator the temptation is to never stop dreaming. It begs the question - In what sense is reality ever preferable? Indeed the end of the movie leaves you wondering (in more ways than one).

But ask yourself - Should you watch a movie where the hero’s job is to manipulate someone’s dreams and thereby their thoughts and perhaps their destiny?

Yes, you should. Moral ambiguity always seems to come with developments in technology. Wake up.

5 comments:

  1. I sooooo want to see this movie...I love stuff like that...

    ReplyDelete
  2. I admired the ideas + visual effects, and agree the premise poses questions tacitly. However, I feel there should be more surface message, I found none.

    Also, I felt the characters were too underdeveloped to make Inception a true masterpiece.
    I've just reviewed Inception on my blog today.

    5 stars , is your rating system 1-5?

    ReplyDelete
  3. moviesandsongs365,

    Your critique of the movie and the lack of character development is something I have heard from a lot of other discerning viewers who saw the film - and I agree. The character dev was a bit disappointing. It's interesting to think about how conscious of a choice this was on the part of Nolan.

    Clearly he thought about the characters a bit. For example, he named the architect (played by Ellen Page) Ariadne. That seems like a deliberate choice when you consider the Greek myth of Ariadne (who helped Theseus escape the Labyrinth). Perhaps the lack of character development is meant to imply that our real selves/history is not important if we can manipulate our dreams? I don't know...

    Yes, it's a five star rating system, but we don't rate the overall quality of the movie - our rating system is based only on how much the movie made us think :).

    ReplyDelete
  4. I hadn't noticed the names might have double meanings , thanks for pointing this out.

    The names are also interesting in The Matrix trilogy, or even the more down to earth film 'Notes on a scandal'. Both those I recommend, if you like thoughtful films.

    I've read that you should stay right until the credits end to understand the ending of Inception.

    Perhaps the character dev is weak because it's a big budget summer blokbuster and they don't want to make it too complex/heavy. Nolan said in interviews he mainly wants to entertain.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Just thought I'd mention I enjoyed Catcher in the rye, which you recommended. You might like to read my review of the book on my blog.

    ReplyDelete